Rep. Sanders drawn out of his own district

Looking for a nice four-bedroom home near I-430 in Little Rock? Rep. David Sanders has had his on the market since April.

Sanders started hearing rumors during the session that he likely would be drawn out of his district by the Board of Apportionment, the three-person panel made up of the governor, attorney general and secretary of state that is redrawing districts based on 2010 census data.

Two of the panelists, Gov. Mike Beebe and Attorney General Dustin McDaniel, are Democrats. The third, Secretary of State Mark Martin, is a Republican.

Under maps produced by the majority Democrats, Sanders’ precinct was bumped from his existing district, District 31, which encompasses parts of west Little Rock, Pulaski County, and Saline County, for District 33, which encompasses central and southwest Little Rock.

Unless your name is Nick Wilson, you have to live in the district you represent, so Sanders would have to run in his new district if the maps are finalized.

District 31 is represented by Rep. Fred Allen, a term-limited Democrat. It’s a majority-minority district and not one where Sanders, a conservative Republican, would be likely to win.

“There’s a certain principle of continuity of constituency,” Sanders said. “The people who voted overwhelmingly for me to be their representative are the people of my home district, 31, and so that’s my district. I still represent that district and will continue to represent that district.”

Sanders had five children and said he needed a bigger house anyway.

There’s no love lost between Gov. Beebe and Sanders, a young and energetic House Republican finance chairman who opposed Beebe’s prison reform in the last session.

Along with Sanders, other GOP legislators drawn into substantially new districts are Sens. Jason Rapert of Bigelow, Jonathan Dismang of Beebe and Eddie Joe Williams of Cabot. Republican Reps. Gary Stubblefield of Branch and Jon Eubanks of Paris would be in District 84 and would have to run against each other.

Two incumbent Democrats, Rep. Garry Smith of Camden and David Fielding of Magnolia, would be in the 5th District and would have to run against each other.

Sanders sponsored and passed a bill in the last legislative session that required a “cooling off” period where regulators cannot work in the industries that they regulate for one year after leaving government. Other bills restricted the activities of sports agents and made student participation in Junior ROTC programs count as health credits.

What if Uncle Sam became a deadbeat dad?

Of course, President Obama, the House and the Senate are going to find some way to merge their competing plans and raise the debt ceiling before August 2.

But what if they don’t?

Two things would happen.

First, the global economy, already shaky, would become even more so. The world’s safest investment, the United States government, would become a lot less safe. Don’t believe it? Consider how the world has reacted to little Greece’s troubles.

Second, the debt would grow, not shrink, despite what some congressmen are telling us. American taxpayers currently pay a very low interest rate on the debt because the government is seen as such a safe investment. What happens if the government is no longer seen as a safe borrower? The same thing that happens if you or I are seen as unsafe borrowers – investors demand higher interest rates in exchange for their capital. Who will pay those higher interest rates? Taxpayers.

Here’s more in this week’s Arkansas News Bureau column.

State releases benchmark exam scores

Test scores of Arkansas public schools improved on 10 of 14 Augmented Benchmark Exams from 2010 to 2011, the Arkansas Department of Education reported today.

The benchmark exams are given to students near the end of grades 3-8. They measure both student and school performance. Students achieve one of four levels: below basic, basic, proficient and advanced. The goal is to get students to at least “proficient.”

Looking at the numbers, it appears that improvements are being made in younger grades but achievement is topping off in the upper grades.

Here’s a breakdown of the different scores compared to last year.
2011 Grade 3 Math – 85 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 3 Math – 84 percent

2011 Grade 3 Literacy – 76 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 3 Literacy – 71 percent

2011 Grade 4 Math – 82 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 4 Math – 80 percent

2011 Grade 4 Literacy – 82 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 4 Literacy – 71 percent

2011 Grade 5 Math – 78 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 5 Math – 74 percent

2011 Grade 5 Literacy – 77 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 5 Literacy – 74 percent

2011 Grade 6 Math – 77 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 6 Math – 75 percent

2011 Grade 6 Literacy – 71 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 6 Literacy – 72 percent

2011 Grade 7 Math – 74 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 7 Math – 75 percent

2011 Grade 7 Literacy – 67 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 7 Literacy – 68 percent

2011 Grade 8 Math – 63 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 8 Math – 63 percent

2011 Grade 8 Literacy – 77 percent proficient and advanced
2010 Grade 8 Literacy – 76 percent

Click here for more info.

McConnell, McCain abdicating responsibility, trying to score points


Did you catch the quotes by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. John McCain in Thursday’s Arkansas Democrat-Gazette story headlined, “Still no give in debt impasse”?

The quotes are referring to a plan McConnell has offered where President Obama would be responsible for raising the debt ceiling and making spending reductions on his own with Congress able to stop it only with a two-thirds vote.

Those are decisions that Congress should make under the Constitution, but that’s not a concern when there are political points to be won. McConnell wants Obama to be responsible for raising the debt ceiling – which McConnell knows has to be done – so Republicans can run ads against him next year for raising the ceiling. It’s political gamesmanship at its ugliest when our country needs statesmanship and leadership most.

Here are the quotes.

McConnell: “I refuse to help Barack Obama get re-elected by marching Republicans into a position where we have co-ownership of a bad economy.”

McCain, in a statement, which means he had time to think about it, said McConnell’s proposal was “a smart, forward-looking plan to make clear to all Americans that should we get to August 2nd without an agreement, it is President Obama alone – and not Republicans in Congress – who decides whether to raise the debt limit, and owns the economic consequences of any default.”

This is abdication of responsibility at its worst, and it’s particularly shocking coming from an American hero like McCain.

This site is called “Independent Arkansas” for a reason, and when I think Democrats are wrong, I’ll say it. President Obama’s warnings that seniors might not get their Social Security checks was particularly silly and not believable.

But Wednesday, these two Republicans were about as wrong as elected officials can be. Sen. McConnell, you have been in the Senate for 27 years. Sen. McCain, you have been in the Senate for 25 years and in Congress since 1982. You own this economy and this debt just as President Obama does. Time and again, you have voted for tax and spending policies that have weighed this terrible burden on our children and grandchildren’s shoulders.

Fix it.

Four crazy ideas to fix our broken political system

If anyone has ever needed proof that America’s political system is broken, look no further than exhibit A: the debt ceiling debate. Congress and the president cannot even agree on paying the debts we have, much less preventing future debt.

It’s not enough just to replace the current occupants of Congress and the White House. It’s time for creative, structural solutions to our nation’s problems.

In this week’s Arkansas News Bureau column, I offer four for your consideration: replacing the Electoral College with the popular vote; four-year terms for both House and Senate members so that we end the two-year election cycle; creating an optional system whereby congressional candidates can access public campaign funds in exchange for a promise not to accept private donations; and reforming the redistricting process.

Maybe these are all crazy ideas, but then, what’s happening now in Washington is truly insane. It’s rattling the markets and putting the government’s credit rating at risk.

Got any crazy ideas of your own? Please email me or post them in my comments section, and I’ll reference them in a future column.